Chronicles of Young Scientists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 57--62

LC-MS metabolomic analysis of environmental stressor impacts on the metabolite diversity in Nephthea spp.


Hedi Indra Januar, Endar Marraskuranto, Gintung Patantis, Ekowati Chasanah 
 Indonesian Research Center for Marine and Fisheries Products Processing and Biotechnology, Jl. KS Tubun Petamburan VI Slipi - Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Hedi Indra Januar
Jl. KS Tubun Petamburan VI Slipi Jakarta Pusat 10260
Indonesia

Abstract

Context: The soft coral Nephthea spp. is a source of terpenoid class that potentially has pharmaceutical properties. However, metabolite diversity and cytotoxic activity of this species are varied among coral reefs from various sites. Aim: To analyze the water quality in Nephthea spp. environment as a possible factor causing a difference in its metabolite diversity. Settings and Design: Nephthea spp. from seven sites were taken in October 2010 at the Alor District of Marine Protected Area, Indonesia. Materials and Methods: Water quality assessment was analyzed in situ and indexed by Canadian Council of Ministry Environment-Water Quality Index (CCME-WQI) method. Meanwhile, metabolite diversity was analyzed by a LC-MS metabolomic method, using C18 reversed phase and gradient water-acetonitrile system. Statistical Analysis Used: Spearman«SQ»s rho and regression analysis were applied to correlate the water quality index to ecological index (richness, diversity, and evenness) from LC-MS results. Results: The water quality index had a significant positive correlation and strong linear regression determinant to the total metabolite (R 2 = 0.704), particularly to semipolar metabolite richness (R 2 = 0.809), the area of terpenoid class in the organism. Conclusion: It can be concluded that water quality may serve as a major factor that affects the amount of richness in Nephthea spp. metabolites. When the water quality is lower, as environment stresses increases, it may affect the metabolite richness within direct disrupt of metabolite biosynthesis or indirect ecological means. Terpenoids are known as a soft coral antipredator (coral fishes), the amount of which depends on the water quality.



How to cite this article:
Januar HI, Marraskuranto E, Patantis G, Chasanah E. LC-MS metabolomic analysis of environmental stressor impacts on the metabolite diversity in Nephthea spp. Chron Young Sci 2012;3:57-62


How to cite this URL:
Januar HI, Marraskuranto E, Patantis G, Chasanah E. LC-MS metabolomic analysis of environmental stressor impacts on the metabolite diversity in Nephthea spp. Chron Young Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 20 ];3:57-62
Available from: http://www.cysonline.org/text.asp?2012/3/1/57/94319


Full Text

 Introduction



Nephthea spp. is one of the soft coral organisms that produce terpenoid compounds, a class of natural products, which have a wide range of pharmaceutical properties, such as cytotoxicity to cancer cell lines, antiviral, or anti-inflammatory. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] However, the cytotoxic activity may vary from the same Nephthea spp. collected from different locations. This finding is suggested to due to the environmental characteristic variation among those species. As various anthropogenic environmental stressors, such as nutrient ions, are introduced to the coral reef community, the impacted Nephthea spp. may have a different amount of bioactive compounds or diversity pattern. [7] Therefore, this research had been done to analyze water quality of Nephthea0 spp. environment as a possible factor causing a difference in natural product diversity extracted from this organism.

Current technology of metabolomic liquid chromatography separation with a mass spectrometer detector was used as a rapid tool to do this research. Metabolomics is a powerful method to analyze metabolic shifted in an organism which adapts with its environment. [8] Commonly, metabolic fingerprint profiles are processed by statistical Principal Component Analysis. [9],[10],[11] Application of this method had been successfully applied to define metabolic shifted which is caused by toxic compounds, such as pesticides or heavy metals. [12],[13] Different than the common processing method, this research used ecology index (richness, divesity, and evenness) as metabolic data processing. The application is based on T-RFs genetic studies, which generate similar graphical results as the mass chromatogram. Besides defining the variation between each chromatogram, the advantage of using ecology index is a further analysis such as correlation and regression could be applied, to analyze the connection between observed variables. The main subject of environmental stressors being analyzed was typical human anthropogenic pollutants, which were nutrient pollutants such as phosphate and inorganic nitrogen substances, at the Alor District Marine Protected Area, one of the famous coral reef area in Indonesia.

 Materials and Methods



Animal materials

Nephthea spp. were taken from seven coral reef sites in the Alor District Marine Protected Area, Indonesia. The locations recorded in GPS Garmin GPSMAP 60CSXA and then were plotted in Bluechart Pacific v9.5 Map using MapSource v6.15.11, as shown in [Figure 1]. Sampling of the organisms was done with a careful inspection on their morphological similarities, to avoid misleading conclusion because of different species. At 5 m depth, 5 g of Nephthea spp. were taken and immediately preserved in 20 mL of JT Baker HPLC-grade methanol in dark-brown vials. All the samples were preserved in an iced cool box while transporting them from the field to the laboratory. {Figure 1}

Sea water quality analysis

From the same sampling sites of Nephthea spp., three replicates of 200 mL of sea water was taken for water quality analysis. Dissolved nitrogen inorganic (nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and phosphate ions were analyzed by a colorimetric method using HACH DR-890 colorimeter. Besides that, pH and salinities were recorded using pH-meter and reflactometer. A Canadian Council of Ministry Environment-Water Quality Index (CCME-WQI) was calculated as CCME-WQI = 100-((√(F1 2 +F2 2 +F3 2 ))/1.732), [14] where F1 = (number of failed variables/total number of variables)×100, F2 = (number of failed test/total number of tests)×100, and F3 = nse/(0.01 nse+0.01). [14] Variable of nse was calculated from nse = ∑ excursions/number of tests, where the excursion = (failed test value/objective value) - 1 or = (objective value/failed test value) - 1. [14] The index was classified as poor (0-44), marginal (45-64), fair (65-79), good (80-94), and excellent (95-100). [14] The objective thresholds used in the calculation were the rule of sea water chemical properties limit for marine organisms by the Indonesian Ministry of Environmental (No. 51/2004), as described in [Table 1].{Table 1}

LC-MS metabolomic analysis

Metabolite diversity was analyzed by a LC-MS Shimadzu 2010A system, using 150×2.0 mm Shimadzu Shim-Pack ODS reversed phase and 50 minutes of gradient of water to an increasing acetonitrile mobile phase. The mobile phase was carried out in 10% acetonitrile and increased to 90% acetonitrile in 30 minutes. The last 20 minutes of the mobile phase system was done using an isocratic 90% acetonitrile in water to elute the nonpolar compounds. After a run was completed, the mobile phase was equilibrated in 10% acetonitrile-water before the next run. Electrospray ionization with low ionization (30 V in Q-array voltage and 150 in Q-array RF) was used in the system to minimize the fragmented ions, and only the molecule peak's ions were detected. The ions were detected in a wide range from 50 to 1000 m/z. Peaks from each chromatogram sample were identified by default qualitative processing from 5 to 50 minutes (to exclude solvent peaks). The peak's data from each LC-MS chromatogram were then subjected to calculate the ecology index: Richness (R), diversity (H'), and evenness (E) index. Furthermore, the richness was divided into three sections: Polar compound (5-10 minutes), semipolar compound (10-25 minutes), and nonpolar compound (25-50 minutes). The section of semipolar is an area of various bioactive terpenoid-cembranoid compounds. [15] Richness index was calculated as the total peak in the chromatogram. [16] Diversity index (H') was calculated from H' = ∑p.i . ln(p.i), where p is the proportion of an individual peak area relative to the sum of all peak areas for each sample. [16] On the other hand, Evenness index (E) was calculated from E = H'/ln(R). [16] Diversity index was classified as low (H' < 1.5), fair (1.5 < H' < 3.5), and rich (H' > 3.5). [17] Meanwhile, if evenness index value was close to 1, it showed about an occurrence of dominant species or ion in the sample. [17] Meanwhile, richness index had no classification, as this value only counts the amount of peaks in MS chromatogram.

Statistical correlation analysis

Spearman's rho analysis using PAST ver. 2.00 Statistical software had been done to correlate WQI index with the ecology index of Nephthea spp. metabolites. Furthermore, linear regression analysis using Microsoft Excel 2007 was applied to identify the fitness of WQI index as a predictor to the diversity of Nephthea spp. metabolites.

 Results



The results of the sea water quality analysis at sampling sites are shown in [Table 1]. pH (7.7-8.2) was normal in all the sites, as their values were within the threshold values (7- 8.5). OD (6.8-7.3 ppm) also showed that oxygen level was sufficient in all sites as they were higher than the threshold value (above 5). On the other hand, the salinity values (31-34) failed to fulfil the thresholds (33-34%). The coral reef areas that failed were Sebanjar and Jawatoda sites. This may have happened as both of these sites are near to domestic run-off. Meanwhile, phosphate and nitrogen ions analysis showed that high nutrient ions exceed the threshold levels at several sites. Due to these eutrophic conditions, the water quality index in all the sites was only within a range of poor to marginal (32-57).

Meanwhile, metabolite diversity differences are observed visually, as shown in [Figure 2]. Index of diversity, richness, and evenness Nephthea spp. metabolites from each chromatogram are shown in [Table 2]. Diversity (H') from all sites was considered to be fair (1.91-2.87) and its evenness (E) showed no significant ion dominance (0.69-0.94). An elevated index variable was shown only in the overall metabolite richness values (12-36). The Spearman's rho correlations of water quality index and ecology index are shown in [Table 3]. A significant correlation was seen between WQI index to the overall richness of Nephthea0 spp. metabolites (R=0.86 at P=0.01), particularly on the semipolar area (R=0.93 at P=0.005). Furthermore, as shown in [Figure 3], linear regression using WQI as an independent variable to total and semipolar richness as a dependent variable generated a mathematical formula below.

Total richness = 0.786 (WQI) - 9.046 (R2 =0.7.04){Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Table 2}{Table 3}

Richness of semipolar compounds = 0.843 (WQI) - 22.89 (R2 =0.809)

 Discussion



The WQI index, only within a range of poor to marginal, showed that even Alor District coral reef community is within a Marine Protected Area (MPA), which is stressed by an environmental pollutant factor. Probably, the major factor of nutrient addition into the reef area was due to domestic pollutant. These may imply that the MPA is not effective in protecting the coral reefs from environmental stressors. A domestic effluent processing is urgently needed to protect the reefs, as high anthropogenic nutrient level or eutrophication may cause a decline in the coral reefs. [18] A shifted hard coral to coralline algae or entirely algae overgrowth might happen as the result of these environmental stresses. [19]

However, Nephthea spp. survived in these eutrophic sampling sites. As a soft coral species, Nephthea spp. can live within a wider range of nutrient level compared with hard coral. [20] Visually, there was not any difference between Nephthea spp. that lived in poor WQI compared with the one that lived at better index. The impacts of nutrient enrichment in coral reef area on Nephthea spp. were within its metabolite productions, as shown in [Figure 2], and defined in the ecology index given in [Table 2].

In general from all sites, diversities of metabolites were considered to be fair and no significant ion dominance as they were within the diversity (H') and evenness (E) index. As the peak's area in mass chromatogram directly showed a proportion of the ion's amount from each peak, [21] this may mean that in all chromatograms, there was no compound that dominates in the extract. The main difference, as visually shown in chromatograms, is the metabolite richness. The elevated overall and semipolar richness was significantly correlated to WQI. Furthermore, as shown in [Figure 3], linear regression analysis showed WQI may serve as a significant predictor to the overall and semipolar richness index. WQI determinant coefficients (R2 ) as much as 0.704 (for total richness) and 0.809 (for richness of semipolar compounds) may mean that variations in both richness depend on 70.4% and 80.4% of the water quality. For about 30-20% more, the variation may depend on variables not included in this research, such as age or other biological stages. However, as the water quality was affected to such high percentages, this finding proves that ecologically, environmental conditions may be considered as the major factor in metabolites diversity in Nephthea spp.

There might be two considerations about how the environmental stresses affected the metabolite diversity in Nephthea spp. First, environmental stresses may directly disrupt several pathways of metabolic production in the organisms. The second is through indirect means, such as the ecological role of terpenoid's class in soft coral. The ecological role of bioactive metabolites in soft corals or sponges is within a chemical defensive weapon, such as to deterrent predator or win a living space competition. [22],[23],[24],[25],[26] Terpenoid class from soft corals known as anti-predator protect the organism from the predator coral reef fishes. [27],[28] Fish such as Chaetodon spp. are known to feed on soft corals such as Nephthea spp. [29] Moreover, as the amount of coral reef fishes depends on the sea water quality, [30] the correlation of sea water quality to metabolite diversity in soft coral may be within an indirect link. It is probable that when the water quality is low, the amount of coral reef fish predators is also low and Nephthea spp. do not produce diverse chemical weapons to protect themselves. However, in a better water quality, the predator may present in higher amount and Nephthea spp. will produce active metabolites to defend themselves. From different soft coral species, Sinularia spp., an increase of antipredator compound caused by a different amount of fish predator was shown. [31]

Therefore, the elevated diversity being found may also be due to a different amount of fish predator in each Nephthea spp. environment. However, neither one is true, and the study showed that in general, direct or indirect means, a diverse metabolite with potentially active compounds in pharmaceutical studies at the coral reefs organism may being compromised or lost, through the increase in marine environmental stresses.

 Acknowledgment



Acknowledgement goes to Vidi Bachtiar Bethan and Marine and Fisheries Office of Alor District for helping in sampling activities.

References

1Cheng SY, Huang, YC, Wena ZH, Hsua CH, Wang SK, Dai CF, et al. New 19-oxygenated and 4-methylated steroids from the formosan soft coral Nephthea chabroli, Steroids 2009;74:543-7.
2Ishii T, Matsuura H, Zhaoqi Z, Vairappan CS. A new Norsesquiterpenoid from a Bornean soft coral genus Nephthea. Molecules 2009;14:4591-6.
3Huang YC, Wen ZH, Wang SK, Hsu CH, Duh CY. New anti-inflammatory 4-methylated steroids from the formosan soft coral Nephthea chabroli. Steroids 2008;73:1181-6.
4Cheng SY, Dai CF, Duha CY. New 4-methylated and 19-oxygenated steroids from the formosan soft coral Nephthea erecta, Steroids 2007;72:653-9.
5Li GQ, Li X, Deng ZW, Guan SH, Lin WH. Two new constituents from the soft coral Nephthea hainansis, Chinese Chem. Lett 2005;16:494-6.
6Patra A, Majumdar A. Secondary metabolites of a soft coral (Nephthea sp.) of the Bay of Bengal, Akrivoc 2003;ix:133-9.
7Januar HI, Chasanah E, Nielson J, Motti C, Tapiolas D, Wright AD. A preliminary study, fine chemicals from Nephthea and Sarcophyton in a local pressure from environmental stressors at seribu islands Indonesia. Manado-Indonesia: Procceding of Biotechnology Session at World Ocean Conference; 2009.
8Lin CY, Viant MR, Tjeerdema RS. Metabolomics: Methodologies and application in the environmental sciences. J Pestic Sci 2006;31:245-51.
9Viant RM. Metabolomics of aquatic organisms: The new 'omics' on the block. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2007;332:301-6.
10Pears MR, Cooper JD, Mitchison HM, Mortishire-Smith RJ, Pearce DA, Griffin JL. High Resolution H-NMR-based metabolomics indicates a neurotransmitter cycling deficit in cerebral tissue from a mouse model of Batten disease. J Biol Chem 2005;280:42508-14.
11Viant MR, Rosenblum ES, Tjeerdema RS. NMR-Based Metabolomics: A powerful approach for characterizing the effects of environmental stressors on organism health. Environ Sci Tech 2003;37:4982-9.
12Santos EM, Ball JS, Williams TD, Wu H, Ortega F, Van Aerle R, et al Identifying health impacts of exposure to copper using transcriptomics and metabolomics in a fish model. Environ Sci Tech 2010;44:820-6.
13Schizas NV, Chandler GT, Coull BT, Klosterhaus SL, Quattro JM. Differential survival of three mitochondrial lineages of a marine benthic copepod exposed to a pesticide mixture. Environ Sci Tech 2001;35:535-8.
14Saffran K, Cash K, Hallard K. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Canada: Canadian Council of Minister of The Environment; 2008.
15Januar HI, Chasanah E, Motti C, Tapiolas D, Liptrot C, Wright AD. Cytotoxic cembranes from indonesian specimens of the soft coral Nephthea sp. Mar Drugs 2010;8:2142-52.
16Mora AC, Hengst MB, Iglesia RD, Andrade S, Correa JA, Lez BG. Changes In bacterial community structure associated with coastal copper enrichment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008;27:2239-45.
17Santosa Y, Ramadhan EP, Rahman DA. Study of mammals diversity in several habitat types in Pondok Ambung Research Station of Tanjung Puting National Park Central Kalimantan. Indonesian Conserv Media 2008;13:1-7.
18Szmart AM. Nutrient Enrichment on coral reefs: Is it a major cause of coral reef decline? Estuarites 2002;25:743-66.
19Coles S. Potential climate change impacts on corals and coral reefs in melanesia from bleaching events and ocean acidification. In: Leisz SJ, Burnett, JB, editors. Climate change and biodiversity in Melanesia. Department of Natural Science, Bishop Museum 2008;42:1-19.
20Koop K, Booth D, Broadbent A, Brodie J, Bucher D, Capone D, et al. ENCORE: The effect of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs. Synthesis of results and conclusions. Mar Poll Bull 2001;42:91-120.
21Dunn WB, Ellis DI. Metabolomics: Current analytical platforms and methodologies. Trends Anal Chem 2005;24:285-94.
22Burns E, Ifrach I, Carmeli S, Pawlik JR, Ilan M. 2003. Comparison of anti-predatory defenses of Red Sea and Caribbean sponges. I. Chemical defense, Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2003;252:105-14.
23Puyana M, Fenical W, Pawlik JR. Are there activated chemical defenses in sponges of the genus Aplysina from the Caribbean?, Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2003;246:127-35.
24Kelly SR, Jensen PR, Henkel TP, Fenical W, Pawlik JR. Effects of Caribbean sponge extracts on bacterial attachment, Aquat Microb Ecol 2003;31:175-82.
25Lindquist N. Chemical defense of early life stages of benthic marine invertebrates. J Chem Ecol 2002;28:1987-99.
26Pawlink JR. Marine invetebrates chemical defenses. Chem Rev 1993;93:1911-22.
27Kelman D, Benayahu Y, Kashman Y. Chemical defence of the soft coral Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum (Forskal) in the Red Sea against generalist reef fish, J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1999;238:127-37.
28Sammarco P, Coll JC. Chemical adaptations in the Octocorallia: Evolutionary considerations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1992;88:93-104.
29La Barre SC, Coll JC, Sammarco PW. Defensive strategies of soft corals (Coelenterata: Octocorallia) of The Great Barrier Reef, The Relationship Between Toxicity and Feeding Deterrence. Biol Bull 1986;171:565-76.
30Bell D, Galzin R. Influence of live coral cover on coral reef fish communities. Mar Ecol 1984;15:265-74.
31Hoover CA, Slattery M, Targett NM, Marsh AG. Transcriptome and metabolite responses to predation in a south pacific soft coral. Bio Bull 2008;214:319-28.